Rather than clarifying matters of political importance or making me think of VP Binay in a redeeming light, his contention had a contrary effect.
In fact, his self-description of being an innovator brought to mind what American sociologist Robert Merton said about “innovation” – not as a quality of creative and imaginative sociocultural change, but as one of the matrices of deviance in society.
According to Merton’s Strain Theory of Deviance, conformity lies in pursuing cultural goals through legitimate means. Hence, social deviance is set up as the disparity between culturally approved goals and culturally approved means of society.
And so, when one pursues illegitimate means to achieve culturally approved goals – such as financial success, political success, and educational success – that person innovatively deviates, and is designated as an “innovator.”
The other matrices of deviance include a “ritualist” who rejects the cultural goals but accepts the legitimate means.
A “retreatist” rejects both cultural goals and legitimate means. Meanwhile, a “rebel” also rejects both cultural goals and legitimate means, but offers alternatives.
I think VP Binay is a twister of words here and can indeed be elusive. And yet, it is not his elusiveness that catches more of my attention but the repetitiveness of his responses to the mounting allegations of corruption.
I must confess that VP Binay is not a unique case.
Other politicians like him have also transformed themselves into single-minded monotones. They remind me of Adolf Hitler’s propagandist, Paul Joseph Goebbels, who argued about the effect of “repetition.”
If you repeat something over and over again, people are bound to start believing it; such that, if you repeat a lie long enough, it becomes truth.
Notice how content VP Binay is: By downgrading all allegations of corruption as a mere swipe at his presidential aspiration, he gets away with not having to confront the alleged cases against him and his family.
And so, when the masses are conditioned to think that all accusations are politically motivated, all controversies are cognitively whisked away since there is no other explanation and there is nothing to explain. — Rappler.com
Efren Padilla is a full professor at California State University, East Bay. His areas of specialization are urban sociology, urban planning, and social demography. During his quarter breaks, he provides pro bono planning consultancy to selected LGUs in the Philippines.