This Gordian knot is deftly untangled by the youngest daughter, the peacemaker, who admonishes, “Quiet. Kung hindi kayo magkasundo sa gusto ninyo, ako nalang ang mamimili.” (Quiet. If you cannot decide what you want to watch, let me pick the movie.)
She stands in front of the whole family as she lectures them on what movie they all will see. Thus, a little child will lead them.
Two adults, teenagers and a househelp are held to the lowest common denominator of choice, the movie appropriate for the child who carries a balloon to a movie house. And they celebrate this forbearance of what they wanted, of not watching movies they are technically allowed to see, by embracing the youngest daughter.
As a piece of cinema, the MTRCB infomercial delivers a subtle message. The government not only censors what we can see but we ourselves should voluntarily self censor. Amongst all the family members only the son is under age for the movie he has chosen. Yet all of them happily agree to watch the GP movie.
Here is the ultimate internalization of the panopticon as suggested by Foucault. Authority figures are no longer needed as we police ourselves. Adult movies with adult themes are rendered inappropriate for adult minds.
There is no outright prohibition imposed on the adults or teenagers from viewing the movies they are allowed to see. The characters freely choose to literally embrace the deciding voice and opinion of a child. Moreover, their abdication of adult thought is celebrated as proper and good. The voluntary conformity of the other members of the family is what is most troubling about this infomercial which strives very hard to be cute and innocuous.
In a country where many people can’t afford to buy lunch, let alone purchase a few hours diversion in a modern cave sitting in front of a very large screen; who cares what they show before movies? We should care because eliminating the poverty of the body begins with eliminating the poverty of the mind.
No one benefits from censorship, no matter how subtly it is branded. Sex, violence, profanity, irreverence, wit; what good can viewing these bring? Anyone who asks that question has never watched A Clockwork Orange or read or seen a Shakespeare play. The world is messy, gloriously topsy turvy. To reflect on it, to think long and deep about things both trivial and profound, we must acknowledge this messiness, perhaps even revel in it.
No one benefits from being told what to think. Being nudged to inhibit curiosity or appreciation of art (whether it be film or literature, painting or dance) is a proposition for intellectual retardation. As the philosopher Peter Singer puts it, “From time to time, outstanding thinkers will emerge who are troubled by the boundaries that custom places on their reasoning, for it is in the nature of reasoning that it dislikes notices saying ‘off limits.’ Reasoning is inherently expansionist.” We don’t need to be exceptional thinkers to be curious, to want to know, to want to think for ourselves.
It’s easy to say that censorship is for our societal good. For example, I’m sure when the MTRCB initially banned the showing of Schindler’s List in the country years ago it was more beneficial to the nation that we not be exposed to a few naked bodies (as if we didn’t see real naked children playing by the highways in our cities) rather than we learn more about the conditions during the Holocaust.
More recently, there was an uproar among Filipino Catholics when the Da Vinci Code movie was shown. Some priests urged their congregations not to watch it. Others said to go ahead and see it as a test of faith.
We have become so intellectually timid that watching an entertaining fiction can create an uproar; can be described as a crucible of belief. St. Peter had himself crucified upside down because he did not think himself worthy of being killed in the same position as Christ. Compared to that watching a movie can be considered a test of faith?
Many people, organizations and governments will tell you what to watch, what to listen, what to read, what to think. The MTRCB infomercial just does it in a sugary sweet manner with smiles and proddings, with arms around the shoulder and the assurance of Big Brother that everything is all right.
This may be appropriate for children but the infomercial would have even adults reduced to an infantile state. There comes a time when we must put away childish things and think on our own.
The infomercial does get one thing right though; the actress playing the older daughter is cute. And I mean that in a PG-13 way, not in an R-18 sense. Not that thinking of someone in an R-18 fashion is wrong. That’s the benefit of being a rational adult. There are no illicit or illegal thoughts. Where even freedom of speech is limited, the freedom of the mind is boundless.
No one, least of all yourself, should constrict your intellectual exploration. Just because movies can make you feel like a child this does not mean that they should make you think like a child as well. – Rappler.com
(Disclosure: Current MTRCB Chair Atty Eugenio Villareal was the author’s thesis advisor in law school. This was 5 years ago, long before Atty Villareal was appointed to his current position. The author has not had any contact with Atty Villareal since his law school years; nor was the author’s thesis about movies or censorship.)
Antonio Conejos is a lawyer and former professor of English at the Ateneo Loyola Schools. He protests too much about the little things and much too little about the big things. As a lad he never went to the movie house to watch age inappropriate movies as he had the internet for that. He writes about books and such at www.litreact.com
iSpeak is a parking space for ideas worth sharing. Send in your contributions to firstname.lastname@example.org.